Label: Third Testament

To wake up

To wake up

Each spiritual tradition seems to have or advocate its own version of that "wake up". Saved or Enlightened. With great similarities, it seems to a layman. A transformative, pervasive experience.

The model I myself am most familiar with is the one presented by and passed on by followers of the Danish mystic Martinus Thomsen. It is a process in several stages, with enlightening experiences of increasing strength. First it comes as "cosmic glimpses", ultimately as a permanent "cosmic consciousness".

True or not, you can read more about that elsewhere. Rather, I am thinking about how skeptical or playful one can be in admitting such experiences when someone testifies about them. Will be a bit of an inquisition over the whole thing.

I don't have too many examples to base my reconnaissance on. But Sture Emby is at least one. This was already in the 50s. Twenty, twenty-five years ago another.

But then a few weeks ago a guy appeared who was open about what he experienced and experienced.

We have had little contact in recent weeks. Not that I intend to vouch for the accuracy of what he claims, or pull any metaphysical gears a la Martinus or some other Enlightenment model on the whole thing. But I think it looks genuine and nice actually. Hard to dismiss.

Here are some clips from other forums, what I thought and thought:

"You can have crazy, rash projects when enthusiasm is high, call it mania, pseudo-mania, or something else. One thing I've come to understand is that this kind of breakthrough experience—whatever it is, metaphysics or just a radical restructuring of the psyche? – is not always a smooth ride.”

“As I said, I do not mix possible metaphysical aspects, steps towards emotional and cognitive perfection, etc., into this. It might be needed, to judge correctly, what do I know. But anyhow. I am well familiar with Martinus Thomsen's 'stepwise' model. At the same time, there are testimonies from everywhere about strong mental experiences that for the individual feel like 'waking up'. So one can experience it in a more pure mania or psychosis, too. But then there are those who believe that it is possible to differentiate in this, as a scale. That some are closer to the psychiatric end, others on the other edge, may appear similar but have a different course, a different prognosis.

The Martinus model seems a bit simplistic, puritanical, I think. Because the originator saw it that way, or because that is how the model has been traded or solidified? You need to be humble in the face of things like this, I think. Everything like that is stirred up, releasing energy, emotions and thoughts, then you get to see where it lands."

"What I wanted to highlight was mostly that the phenomenon of 'awakening' is something that has been researched and thought about even far outside of metaphysical contexts with a clearly established development model. Really new to this, but is there such a thing as Transpersonal psychology? Which, as I have understood it, partly arose because some psychologists and others thought that there seemed to be a difference between 'psychosis' and 'psychosis'.

I think that fundamentally it is a radical internal restructuring. That it is mainly this. How to feel about yourself and the world and yourself in the world.

I keep it open that, for example, drugs can in some cases have the same function as a powerful catalyst for such a 'restructuring'. Sometimes in combination with psychotherapy. Was reminded of that when watching this documentary and trailer.

Maybe it does not fit well both in the usual psychiatric system and in the Martinus doctrine as it is sold?”

Martinus Thomsen and his movement

Martinus Thomsen and his movement

It has probably loomed up here and there that I became interested in the Danish mystic Martinus Thomsen (d. 1981) and his visions. Here is a post I posted elsewhere this spring for the centenary of what he himself said was the starting point for his work. What makes me think of him right now? Yes, this week a verdict was reached in a protracted dispute over copyright that had been going on for ten years and which had split and divided the Martinus movement. Isn't that strange in and of itself, that kind of thing happens in most spiritual contexts.

This is not a debate post. No recruitment attempt either. A bit of new-spirited monitoring of the world and a VDN marking of me, you can probably see it as. And my opinion of right and wrong in the dispute does not belong here. Let the dead bury their dead, I'm just saying. Life goes on.
- - -

Behind this window, in the days a hundred years ago, something strange happened. The young dairyman Martinus Thomsen came home one evening, sat down in his wicker chair and immediately had some kind of prophetic experience that sent him in an unexpected direction for the rest of his life.

Well, it's actually remarkable no matter how you look at it. Philosophical of life, because of what he later shared, if you are inclined in that direction. Religious studies. A mystic in our local area with a large production of texts, lectures and "symbolic images" over half a century which - until now - hardly received any attention at all from the academic world.

Or psychologically. I never met him myself. I became familiar with Martinus Thomsen and his dizzying "cosmology" only the year after he died. But I have met many who knew him. And he seems to have behaved himself, no strangeness, no major scandals or extravagances. The picture you get is of a simple, friendly and fun-loving man. Indeed, over time he became a kind of cult leader, with a few thousand faithful followers. But there was never very much money involved, no missionary work, there was absolutely nothing you could become a member of.

So psychologically, he is not easy to understand, or explain away, either. That is, to bring the person together with the work. A psychotic, or at least disturbed, someone driven by a desire to impress and gain power over others, etc. He actually seems to have been a rather different neo-spiritual foreground figure. I often say that this movement is like my spiritual home. Nowadays hardly more than this. But I always think of Martinus Thomsen (1890-1981) with warmth.

(The chair is preserved at the Martinus Institute in Copenhagen. The house at Jagtvej 52 still stands and looks much like it did then. He himself rests in a small mausoleum in Frederiksberg's old cemetery.)