Trying to grasp the elusive
Some models that were added during the work with my ex-work to become a psychologist. None of the pictures (and no one else either) were included in the finished one the essay.
Some models that were added during the work with my ex-work to become a psychologist. None of the pictures (and no one else either) were included in the finished one the essay.
This is an attempt to categorize individuals who in one way or another may come into contact with psychiatry and where their "cult" involvement may be part of what needs to be mapped, understood and treated. It's a draft, a thought experiment. For the vast majority who come into contact with psychiatry, this is not relevant anyway, it is a few.
But, the picture should therefore be read as: "Individuals who have left or are still under the influence of...", etc...
In the upper left field we have the well-known sects, such as the Church of Scientology, Hare Krishna, the Moon movement/Unification Church. The most famous "Swedish" example is Jehovah's Witnesses. Certain political organizations, such as IS, also belong in that box. It is likely that equivalents can be found in Sweden. They are united by precisely a "utopian" view of how society and the world should be set up. Some of them resort to violence, let "the ends justify the means", because it is so important that the ends be achieved and the pure ideals honored.
In the upper right box we have criminal organizations, such as Hells Angels or Bandidos. They are closed, characterized by strong cohesion, but rarely have any utopian visions. Their focus is more on making the most of their presence in society. There are examples of commercial cults as well. Sometimes you hear about them in the media. Companies (often in the sales industry) that are run in a charismatic way, with employee meetings similar to revival meetings, but where the vision is to do as well as possible in the market (ie make money). That I put cultures of honor in this box may seem strange. Aren't they often religious? Nah, I think it's less important. Most often, these rest on cultural patterns and customs, which existed before religion came into the picture.
The lower left corner requires a little more explanation. Here you normally find no "sects" or even membership. These are unorganized (or at most weakly organized) movements or communities of interest. This category appears in (superficial, bad) self-help literature, ordinary superstitions and various TV programs on TV4/Kanal 7, about mediums, haunted houses, and the like. Most of the time it is completely harmless, or even an asset (we need to play and dream too!), but for some individuals this way of looking at life becomes a problem. It is utopian, idealized, but an interest you cultivate more or less on your own.
The box at the bottom right contains people with very firm beliefs about various forms of conspiracy theories. Examples of this are "chem trails" (that is, there is a spraying of the atmosphere for more or less malicious reasons), that the world is controlled by a secret, hugely powerful elite, which is sometimes called the New World Order or "Illuminati". Here, one encounters rather the opposite of utopia: "dystopia". They are beliefs that can be so enchanting and hard to shake. It is distrust of those in power or criticism of civilization that has crossed the line into the fantastic.
Each square in the diagram also of course has its completely unproblematic side. For the treatment of these individuals, the religious (or whatever it is) is not relevant. Their problems have nothing or very little to do with this. If you go through the boxes in the same order: Belonging to a religious congregation can of course be something strengthening and nice. There is a lot of research, especially from the USA, that shows this. Working for a company, or being part of one or another "worldly" organization, with strong cohesion and a shared vision, is of course not automatically a bad thing. Nor to be interested in astrology, reincarnation, séances, to be convinced that telepathy works, etc.
What should be placed in the last box? In the religious area, I am tempted to write the Church of Sweden and Friskis & Svettis yoga. It does have a spiritual origin, but in its current form is neither utopian nor characterized by a great deal of peer pressure.
Various texts (2009-2014) about this figure. May seem speculative, or elitist, but relates to research by primarily theologian and developmental psychologist James D. Fowler. Psychologists such as Abraham Maslow and Erik H. Erikson have also contributed to the "stage theories" genre. I have mainly been interested in Fowler and his research on ffa believing Christians.
The texts contain many different designations for the vertical and horizontal axis, levels and types, and the figure itself, but by and large the basic ideas are the same. Will try to compile and transpose the best ideas into something coherent later:
Dealing with the paradoxical
What should the types be called?
Inventory
Thoughts about the shoulders in the figure
A second boldness
ASC
Levels and types in the figure. Reflections and comparisons with other systems (PDF)
During my ex-work, I tried to make many different models. Here is a collection of sketches and drafts:
Model workshop 2009-2014
A special model and its development (ASC)
which also got its own section, with thoughts and musings, old and new:
An experiment
This figure underwent the most changes, and refinements, probably reworkings as well. It was an attempt to describe how types of spirituality interact with personality structure. Speculative, of course, but not exclusively. This version was the last, or latest:
- - - - - -
Here are some previous versions. The first sketch looked like this. It was in December -09:
As I remember it, the "4 fielder" felt too static, so started experimenting with "coordinate systems" instead. Then it turned out like this:
Then like this:
With text:
After that came this, like waves:
And then this one, started experimenting with shaded fields:
At the top:
And then like this:
A little more succinctly:
Maybe mirrored?
One of the latest versions was this one:
Then the figure had its final shape (at the top of the page)
Some attempts to flesh out spirituality in general, and contemporary spirituality in particular (click on the images to enlarge!).
This figure was a variant of the yinyang symbol. The most innovative thing was probably the small "monads", how they were named and how they related to each other. They could be worth building on, I think:
This one was an attempt to see how the three basic beliefs in new age/new spirituality, as I saw it, related to each other. That is, that there was spirituality that included one, two or all (reincarnation, karma, and the notion of the individual's development towards emotional and cognitive perfection). I called it the FUKAR model, and a spirituality that encompassed all beliefs was called “Fukarian spirituality”:
Here is one text with some elaboration of how the thoughts went.
And one more:
Here is another sketch of how different contemporary spiritualities might conceivably relate to each other, overlapping:
A similar. Was it possible to capture something common, overlapping, that deserved to be given its own name. I thought so, and tried for a while to call it “NA”:
This picture doesn't contain much detail, it's more of an illustration. But of something very central and important. Inspired by James Fowler and his Faith Development Theory, the concept of “a second naïvité”:
The figure I gave the most thought to was this one. “Adult spirituality chart”, with several working names:
It's got its own thread HERE.